CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN
2005-2006
Committee
Members
Kinsey Murphree Teresa Box
Darla Lacy Alicia Franco
Ann Marie Majors Dusty Precure
Craig Lacy Mike Glaze
Vicki Spiegel Jack Gaskins
District/Campus Improvement Plan 2005-06
GOAL I Improve Planning Process and Curriculum
SUBGOAL A
OBJECTIVE 1 Students will enroll in pre-advanced and
advanced placement classes in addition to honors classes
Enrollment will increase in AP
classes
Parents will encourage students to enter AP
track
|
Strategies |
Responsibility |
Timeline |
Resources |
Formative Evaluation |
Summative Evaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highly qualified professional staff for student placement |
Staff School board Administrators |
August-May |
Local |
SAT/ACT score reports |
SAT/ACT score reports |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Counsel students about advantages of enrollment in these classes |
Staff Administrators Vicki Spiegel |
August-May |
Professional education training |
AP tests, CLEP tests, or Dual Credit course completions |
Enrollment in AP and dual credit classes, CLEP tests results. Number of students signed up for tests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Explanation of Pre-AP & AP program to parents |
Staff Administrators Students Parents Vicki Spiegel |
During Open House and Spring pre-registration for coming year (September and May) |
Parent/staff meetings, information home to parents |
Students will gain confidence in learning abilities Parents will gain knowledge of Pre-AP & AP programs |
Parent meeting agendas List of parents attending Parent surveys |
District/Campus Improvement Plan 2005-06
GOAL I Improve Planning Process and Curriculum
SUBGOAL A
OBJECTIVE 2 100% of Seniors will graduate from
|
Strategies |
Responsibility |
Timeline |
Resources |
Formative Evaluation |
Summative Evaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identify seniors at risk of not graduating |
Jack Gaskins Vicki Spiegel |
Each 6 weeks |
Four-year plan Transcripts Grade Reports |
Seniors at risk of not graduating are identified |
Six weeks checks Transcripts Grade reports |
|
|
|
|
|
Four-year plan Transcripts Grade Reports |
|
|
SBDM team and faculty discuss strategies to keep seniors focused toward graduation |
Classroom teacher |
As needed |
Local |
Graduation documentation |
Number of graduates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weekly update/assignment to tutorials in all subject areas |
Jack Gaskins Vicki Spiegel Debbie Wood Classroom teacher |
Weekly |
Local |
Seniors will successfully complete all courses |
Report cards Transcripts |
District/Campus Improvement Plan 2005-06
GOAL I Improve Planning Process and Curriculum
SUBGOAL A
OBJECTIVE 3 85% of Seniors will graduate with Recommended
or Distinguished Achievement seals on transcripts
|
Strategies |
Responsibility |
Timeline |
Resources |
Formative Evaluation |
Summative Evaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identify graduation plans |
Jack Gaskins Vicki Spiegel |
August, January,
and May of each year |
TEA graduation guidelines |
Number of Seniors with advanced seals will increase |
Check number of Seniors with advanced seals on transcripts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluate 4-year graduation plan Identify potential graduates on advanced plan |
Jack Gaskins Vicki Spiegel |
Each semester |
4-year plan |
Identify students via 4-year plan |
List of potential graduates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SBDM team and faculty discuss strategies to encourage students to achieve the advanced seal |
Staff and team develop a plan |
August |
Local |
Increase number of seniors who graduate with advanced seals |
Transcripts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Develop 4-year plan during 9th grade year |
Jack Gaskins Vicki Spiegel Staff |
During pre-registration (May) |
Local |
Parents aware of criteria of graduating with advanced seal and all graduation requirements |
4-year plan Parent survey |
District/Campus Improvement Plan 2005-06
GOAL I Improve Planning Process and Curriculum
SUBGOAL A
OBJECTIVE 4 100% of all students taking the T.A.K.S. will
pass all subject areas including the target populations:
economically disadvantaged, at-risk, ethnic
groups, special education, G/T
Exit
Level- Students not taking T.A.K.S. will be successful on other assessments
given at appropriate grade level.
|
Strategies |
Responsibility |
Timeline |
Resources |
Formative Evaluation |
Summative Evaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SBDM team and faculty discuss strategies to insure students receive adequate preparation to pass all subject areas of TAKS & approved assessments |
Staff SBDM team |
Every 6 weeks |
TAKS materials, textbooks, |
100% students who take the TAKS will pass all subject areas |
TAKS results each year Review and adjust plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Students will regularly practice writing exercises |
Teacher Student |
Weekly |
Teacher-generated material |
Skills measured by TAKS will be enhanced Report cards |
TAKS results Teacher assessment of student growth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Students will regularly practice reading skills, both silent and oral reading skills |
Teacher Student |
Weekly |
Library, teacher-student-owned books, hands-on computer programs |
Skills measured by TAKS will be enhanced Report cards |
TAKS results each year SRC points accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Through daily practice students will review and learn new skills relating to all methods of problem solving in math |
Teacher Student |
Daily |
Calculator, cross curriculum, hands-on computer programs, manipulatives |
Skills measured by TAKS will be enhanced Report cards |
TAKS results Teacher assessment of student growth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remediation activities will be utilized to strengthen the students in needed areas |
Teacher Student Jack Gaskins |
Daily morning and afternoon tutorials |
TAKS materials, textbooks, hands-on computer programs, calculator, teacher- generated manipulatives |
Skills measured by TAKS will be enhanced Report cards |
TAKS results Teacher assessment of student growth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TAKS reading objectives, vocabulary/ terminology will be practiced/used across all curriculum areas |
Staff Jack Gaskins |
Daily |
Teacher-generated materials TAKS vocabulary/ terminology master list |
Skills measured by TAKS will be enhanced Report cards |
TAKS results Teacher assessment of student growth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All faculty members will incorporate TAKS problem-solving strategies across all curriculum areas |
Staff Jack Gaskins |
Daily |
Teacher-generated materials TAKS strategies master list |
Skills measured by TAKS will be enhanced Report cards |
TAKS results Teacher assessment of student growth |
GOAL I Improve Planning Process and Curriculum
SUBGOAL A
OBJECTIVE 5 At least 75% of the graduating class will take a college admissions
test. The percentage of students who
take a college admission test and score at or above the criterion will continue
to increase each year.
|
Strategies |
Responsibility |
Timeline |
Resources |
Formative Evaluation |
Summative Evaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identify students by disaggregation of ACT/SAT score |
Jack Gaskins Vicki Spiegel Staff |
August And January |
ACT/SAT scores |
Identify students who have not taken the ACT/SAT and those
who need to retake it to meet criterion |
Results of ACT/SAT tests given to each teacher |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SBDM team and faculty discuss methods to increase participation in college admissions tests |
Faculty |
As needed |
None |
Student participation in taking ACT/SAT will increase |
Check percentages of seniors taking ACT/SAT tests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent/student orientation to give information on ACT/SAT, college requirements, & score interpretation, etc. |
Faculty Jack Gaskins Vicki Spiegel |
Annually at Open House and during Spring pre-registration |
Government funded programs and materials |
Parents are informed, along with students, about college requirements, ACT/SAT test dates and fees |
Sign-in sheets for parents Parent surveys Counselor’s monthly newsletters |
GOAL I Improve Planning Process and Curriculum
SUBGOAL A
OBJECTIVE 6 At least 33% of graduating class will score at or above the recognized
college entrance criterion. The
percentage of students who take a college admission test and score at or above
the criterion will continue to increase each year.
|
Strategies |
Responsibility |
Timeline |
Resources |
Formative Evaluation |
Summative Evaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule time for students to utilize software to help them prepare for SAT/ACT test |
Jack Gaskins Vicki Spiegel Staff |
Seniors-twice weekly Juniors-weekly after TAKS administration |
Local |
ACT/SAT scores will increase |
Compare scores of students as provided by testing companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACT and SAT practice materials and software will be updated and participation of seniors will be required |
Jack Gaskins Vicki Spiegel Staff |
September – May |
ACT/SAT software and study materials |
Student participation in taking ACT/SAT will increase ACT/SAT scores will increase |
Parents of seniors taking ACT/SAT tests and scores on these tests |
GOAL I Improve Planning Process and Curriculum
SUBGOAL B
OBJECTIVE 1 Vertical alignment of all sequential courses
Meetings
will continue in 2005-2006 to further ensure the alignment of classes.
|
Strategies |
Responsibility |
Timeline |
Resources |
Formative Evaluation |
Summative Evaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject matter Teacher meetings |
Administration Dept. Heads Staff |
Meet twice a year and check progress |
TEKS Textbooks |
Curriculum will be sequential |
TAKS results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implement TEKS Reassess curriculum Improve availability of resources |
Teachers Administration |
Monthly or as often as needed |
Computer program AEIS-it TEKS Textbooks |
No gaps in curriculum |
Students will come to each grade prepared AEIS-it data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coordination with 8th grade teachers to plan transitional needs in various subject areas |
Teachers Administration |
April and May |
TEKS TAKS objectives AEIS-it |
No gaps in Curriculum |
Students will come to each grade prepared AEIS-it data |
District/Campus Improvement Plan 2005-06
GOAL I Improve Planning Process and Curriculum
SUBGOAL B
OBJECTIVE 2 Annually
the High School curriculum will be examined and evaluated for student needs,
TEA requirements and student success.
|
Strategies |
Responsibility |
Timeline |
Resources |
Formative Evaluation |
Summative Evaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent meetings |
Administration Staff Parents |
Open House, Site-Based Committee, and informally as needed |
Local |
Curriculum will stay current |
Survey, meeting and discussions, compare curriculum with
state recommendations and local needs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluations sent home to parents |
Administration Staff Parents |
March |
Student grades, student achievement on SAT/ACT |
Curriculum will stay current |
Survey, meeting and discussions, compare curriculum with state recommendations and local needs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEA requirements |
Administration Staff Parents |
Each Spring during pre-registration |
State curriculum documents |
Curriculum will stay current |
Comparison with state curriculum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
District/Campus Improvement Plan 2005-06